Evaporative cooling is staying
The owner wants to preserve efficient heat rejection while reducing makeup demand and blowdown discharge.
For engineering and design teams
A practical screening path for consulting engineers, MEP teams, EPCs, cooling specialists, and water partners evaluating on site cooling water recovery.

When to include RECOVER
The owner wants to preserve efficient heat rejection while reducing makeup demand and blowdown discharge.
Supply, sewer capacity, local rates, drought planning, or public commitments are shaping the design decision.
The team needs a defensible first model before committing to detailed chemistry review, equipment selection, or a pilot scope.
First screening review
Nona can begin with an incomplete basis of design. The first review identifies whether RECOVER fits the operating case, which assumptions drive the economics, and what information is still needed.
Technical review path
See the process, field demonstration, applications, and system comparison.
Open resourceReview the water balance, treatment paths, cycles, and site-specific tradeoffs.
Open resourceCompare separation method, pressure, fouling, pretreatment, recovery, and best-fit cases.
Open resourceProject review
Bring the owner, engineer, or water partner into one focused screening conversation. Nona will review the current assumptions, identify missing inputs, and clarify whether a deeper technical evaluation is warranted.
Use approved project information only. A screening conversation does not replace detailed engineering or site-specific water chemistry review.